|
''Burdick v. United States'', 236 U.S. 79 (1915),〔(236 U.S. 79 ) Full text of the opinion courtesy of Findlaw.com.〕 was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that: * A pardoned man must introduce the pardon into court proceedings, otherwise the pardon must be disregarded by the court. * To do this, the pardoned man must accept the pardon. If a pardon is rejected, it cannot be forced upon its subject. * A pardon carries an "imputation of guilt", and accepting a pardon is "an admission of guilt". A pardon is an act of grace, proceeding from the power intrusted with the execution of the laws, which exempts the individual on whom it is bestowed from the punishment the law inflicts for a crime he has committed. It is the private though official act of the executive magistrate, delivered to the individual for whose benefit it is intended. A private deed, not communicated to him, whatever may be its character, whether a pardon or release, is totally unknown and cannot be acted on. ''United States v. Wilson'' established that it is possible to reject a (conditional) pardon, even for a capital sentence. Burdick affirmed that the same principle extends to unconditional pardons. ==Case history== A grand jury was investigating whether any Treasury Department employee was leaking information to the press. George Burdick, city editor of the ''New York Tribune'', took the fifth and refused to reveal the source of his information. He was handed a pardon by President Woodrow Wilson but he refused to accept it or testify. He was fined $500 and jailed until he complied. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Burdick v. United States」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|